The paper highlights the progressive interpretations and approaches of the judiciary that not only uphold the constitutional principle of equality and non-discrimination but also contribute to uplift the position of women in society.
The paper also indicates a static and conservative approach of the judiciary in a few cases that could have been dealt with more positively. The paper suggests developing a consistent and coherent pattern of judicial activism in order to make Muslim family law pragmatic and effective.Standing for Nature offers advocates a blueprint for creating, implementing, and safeguarding rights of Nature laws. This book looks closely at four examples—New Zealand, Colombia, Bangladesh, and the United States—to explain why these laws have been successful in some places but not others. Through this comparative exploration, the authors highlight key strategies for advancing rights of Nature laws in the United States and around the world. These lessons include an examination of different legal traditions to better understand which is the best form of law—judicial, legislative, or regulatory—for advocates to target; how to ensure effective implementation once a law is passed; and how to shift communal perspectives on the human-Nature relationship for better implementation and enforcement.
This book is essential for environmental lawyers, policy makers, and advocates interested in gaining new knowledge and tools for championing rights of Nature laws in their own communities.Ain o Salish Kendra (ASK) held an online discussion on “Ensuring Government’s Human Rights Accountability: Is the NHRC fulfilling its Mandate?” to explore whether the NHRC was playing its due role in fulfilling its mandate to its full potential.
During the virtual discussion, the panelists shed light on several important aspects of the NHRC's performance in recent years.
Considering its importance and the lack of appropriate reflections in current Bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and International Investment Agreements (IIAs), and the approach of judicial bodies both at national and international levels, this paper examines the scope of climate change mitigation before the ISDS Tribunals through the lens of investment protection standards available in current international investment law regime.
This paper also examines how far the approach of current ISDS Tribunals can contribute to addressing the matter for future climate change mitigation claims. It highlights the controversy surrounding the interrelation between FDI and alleged breach of environmental pollution or climate change concerns and the challenges the ISDS Tribunals face in addressing the issue.