A

Are Western Oligarchies a Long Detour of Civilization?

From Observatory

The evolution of economic ideologies from antiquity to the present day highlights contrasting approaches to managing money, credit, and debt. In ancient times, Bronze Age rulers recognized the need for public oversight of the monetary system to prevent economic instability caused by debt accumulation. However, modern economic orthodoxy prioritizes the sanctity of contracts and deregulation, leading to the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of financial elites.

Neoliberal policies advocate for deregulation and privatization under the guise of promoting democracy and prosperity. This approach, popularized by figures like Francis Fukuyama, places economic planning in the hands of financial centers, leading to rent extraction and wealth polarization. Similarly, ancient oligarchies demonized public oversight to privatize economic rent, contributing to economic polarization and societal austerity.

The collapse of ancient civilizations like Rome was attributed to the monopolization of land and wealth by creditor-landowning oligarchies, which opposed debt relief and land redistribution. In contrast, the Bronze Age's management of credit and debt demonstrated an alternative approach, treating the monetary system as a public utility to ensure economic resilience.

Overall, understanding the historical dynamics of credit and debt management provides insights into contemporary economic challenges and the potential for alternative models that prioritize public welfare over private interests.

Read full article "Are Western Oligarchies a Long Detour of Civilization?" by Michael Hudson.

🔭   This summary was human-edited with AI-assist.

Have you signed up yet?

We’re building a guide for everyday life, where experts will educate you about our world.